Citation Information

  • Title : Net carbon flux from agricultural ecosystems: methodology for full carbon cycle analyses
  • Source : Environmental Pollution
  • Publisher : Elsevier
  • Volume : 116
  • Issue : 3
  • Pages : 439-444
  • Year : 2002
  • DOI : 10.1016/S0269-74
  • ISBN : 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00221-4
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Marland, G.
    • West, T. O.
  • Climates:
  • Cropping Systems: Conservation cropping systems. No-till cropping systems. Till cropping systems.
  • Countries:

Summary

Agricultural ecosystems have the potential to sequester carbon in soils by altering agricultural management practices (i.e. tillage practice, cover crops, and crop rotation) and using agricultural inputs (i.e. fertilizers and irrigation) more efficiently. Changes in agricultural practices can also cause changes in CO2 emissions associated with these practices. In order to account for changes in net CO2 emissions, and thereby estimate the overall impact of carbon sequestration initiatives on the atmospheric CO2 pool, we use a methodology for full carbon cycle analysis of agricultural ecosystems. The analysis accounts for changes in carbon sequestration and emission rates with time, and results in values representing a change in net carbon flux. Comparison among values of net carbon flux for two or more systems, using the initial system as a baseline value, results in a value for relative net carbon flux. Some results from using the full carbon cycle methodology, along with US national average values for agricultural inputs, indicate that the net carbon flux averaged over all crops following conversion from conventional tillage to no-till is -189 kg C ha(-1) year(-1) (a negative value indicates net transfer of carbon from the atmosphere). The relative net carbon flux, using conventional tillage as the baseline, is -371 kg C ha(-1) year(-1), which represents the total atmospheric CO2 reduction caused by changing tillage practices. The methodology used here illustrates the importance of (1) delineating system boundaries, (2) including CO2 emissions associated with sequestration initiatives in the accounting process, and (3) comparing the new management practices associated with sequestration initiatives with the original management practices to obtain the true impact of sequestration projects on the atmospheric CO2 pool.

Full Text Link