Citation Information

  • Title : Rye-corn silage double-cropping reduces corn yield but improves environmental impacts.
  • Source : Agronomy Journal
  • Publisher : American Society of Agronomy
  • Volume : 104
  • Issue : 4
  • Pages : 888-896
  • Year : 2012
  • DOI : 10.2134/agronj20
  • ISBN : 10.2134/agronj2011.0341
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Reicosky, D.
    • Porter, P.
    • Baker, J.
    • Ochsner, T.
    • Krueger, E.
  • Climates: Warm summer continental/Hemiboreal (Dsb, Dfb, Dwb).
  • Cropping Systems: Double Cropping. Continuous cropping. Maize. Rye.
  • Countries: USA.

Summary

Recent proliferation of large dairies has prompted concern regarding environmental impacts of associated corn silage production and high-rate manure application. Our objectives were to compare environmental impacts and forage production of monocrop corn ( Zea mays L.) silage and rye ( Secale cereal L.)-corn silage double-crop systems with multiple corn planting dates and high-rate manure application near Morris, MN. From 2007 to 2009, corn for silage was seeded into a silt loam as a monocrop in early and mid-May and as a double-crop after rye in mid-May and early June. Manure was fall applied annually at average total N and P rates of 393 and 109 kg ha -1, respectively. Double-cropping reduced total forage dry matter (DM) yield 2 of 3 yr and reduced corn DM yield 15 to 25%. Soil NO 3-N to 90 cm accumulated at an average rate of 71 kg N ha -1 yr -1 with monocropping, but accumulation was not observed with double-cropping. Soil organic C concentration from 0 to 5 cm increased in the monocrop (18%) and double-crop (26%) systems over 3 yr. Average soil solution NO 3-N concentration was high with monocropping (52 mg L -1) and double-cropping (37 mg L -1), but estimated leaching load averaged only 8 kg ha -1 yr -1. Fall and spring ground cover was often less than 10% with monocropping but was usually greater than 30% with double-cropping. The primary environmental concerns identified for monocrop corn silage were soil NO 3-N buildup and inadequate ground cover. Double-cropping addressed each concern but often decreased forage production.

Full Text Link