Citation Information

  • Title : Soil carbon dioxide emission and carbon content as affected by irrigation, tillage, cropping system, and nitrogen fertilization.
  • Source : Journal of Environmental Quality
  • Publisher : American Society of Agronomy/Crop Science Society of America/Soil Science Society of America
  • Volume : 37
  • Issue : 1
  • Pages : 98-106
  • Year : 2008
  • DOI : 10.2134/jeq2006.
  • ISBN : 10.2134/jeq2006.
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Stevens, W.
    • Jabro, J.
    • Sainju, U.
  • Climates: Steppe (BSh, BSk).
  • Cropping Systems: Barley. Cereal crops. Irrigated cropping systems. Rye. Till cropping systems.
  • Countries: USA.

Summary

Management practices can influence soil CO 2 emission and C content in cropland, which can effect global warming. We examined the effects of combinations of irrigation, tillage, cropping systems, and N fertilization on soil CO 2 flux, temperature, water, and C content at the 0- to 20-cm depth from May to November 2005 at two sites in the northern Great Plains. Treatments were two irrigation systems (irrigated vs. non-irrigated) and six management practices that contained tilled and no-tilled malt barley ( Hordeum vulgaris L.) with 0 to 134 kg N ha -1, no-tilled pea ( Pisum sativum L.), and a conservation reserve program (CRP) planting applied in Lihen sandy loam (sandy, mixed, frigid, Entic Haplustolls) in western North Dakota. In eastern Montana, treatments were no-tilled malt barley with 78 kg N ha -1, no-tilled rye ( Secale cereale L.), no-tilled Austrian winter pea, no-tilled fallow, and tilled fallow applied in dryland Williams loam (fine-loamy, mixed Typic Argiborolls). Irrigation increased CO 2 flux by 13% compared with non-irrigation by increasing soil water content in North Dakota. Tillage increased CO 2 flux by 62 to 118% compared with no-tillage at both places. The flux was 1.5- to 2.5-fold greater with tilled than with non-tilled treatments following heavy rain or irrigation in North Dakota and 1.5- to 2.0-fold greater with crops than with fallow following substantial rain in Montana. Nitrogen fertilization increased CO 2 flux by 14% compared with no N fertilization in North Dakota and cropping increased the flux by 79% compared with fallow in no-till and 0 kg N ha -1 in Montana. The CO 2 flux in undisturbed CRP was similar to that in no-tilled crops. Although soil C content was not altered, management practices influenced CO 2 flux within a short period due to changes in soil temperature, water, and nutrient contents. Regardless of irrigation, CO 2 flux can be reduced from croplands to a level similar to that in CRP planting using no-tilled crops with or without N fertilization compared with other management practices.

Full Text Link