Citation Information

  • Title : Farmers' experiences with the companion cropping of lucerne in North Central Victoria.
  • Source : Solutions for a better environment: Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference, Geelong, Victoria, Australia, 2-6 February 2003
  • Publisher : The Regional Institute
  • Pages : 0-4
  • Year : 2003
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Crawford, M.
    • Ransom, K.
    • Hirth, J.
    • Harris, R.
    • Naji, R.
  • Climates: Steppe (BSh, BSk).
  • Cropping Systems: Barley. Canola. Intercropping. Oats. Wheat. Cereal crops.
  • Countries: Australia.

Summary

Companion cropping (also known as intercropping) of lucerne involves sowing an annual crop into an existing lucerne stand. A sample of eight farmers from north central Victoria, Australia, who currently companion crop, were interviewed to document the impact of this practice on grain production, and to determine why and how they used this approach in their farming system. All eight farmers companion cropped lucerne to produce grain for either human or livestock consumption. Wheat, barley, oat and triticale were most commonly sown into lucerne stands, with rape less frequently companion cropped. Most companion-cropped stands of lucerne were either winter-active or highly winter-active cultivars and most had densities of 10-30 plants/m 2. They were commonly 9-12 months old, although some stands up to 10 years old were successfully companion cropped. Sowing rates of the annual crop were generally greater than those used in conventional monoculture cropping, and most farmers sowed diagonally across existing lucerne rows. Most interviewed farmers adopted companion cropping because of perceived better economic returns from cropping rather than grazing their second-year stands of lucerne, which then became more persistent and productive stands for future grazing. Farmers who companion cropped into mature stands aimed to maintain year-round plant transpiration to minimize the impact of their cropping practices on local groundwater systems, through a better hydrologic balance between the rainfall and their vegetation. Decreased grain yields from companion-cropped crops were common, and were estimated to be 10 to 80% of those obtained in the absence of lucerne. The magnitude of the yield decreases appeared to be most strongly influenced by seasonal conditions. The use of herbicides for in-crop lucerne suppression was perceived to enhance grain quality by slowing lucerne growth over the late winter-spring period, thereby reducing lucerne seed and herbage contamination at harvest. As seasonal and soil water conditions critically influenced the success of herbicide applications, specialist advice was often sought.

Full Text Link