Citation Information

  • Title : Soil properties change in no-till tomato production.
  • Source : California Agriculture
  • Publisher : Regents of the University of California
  • Volume : 55
  • Issue : 1
  • Pages : 30-34
  • Year : 2001
  • DOI : 10.3733/ca.v055n
  • ISBN : 10.3733/ca.v055n01p30
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Morse, R. D.
    • Miyao, E. M.
    • Temple, S. R.
    • Lanini, W. T.
    • Mitchell, J. P.
    • Herrero, E. V.
    • Campiglia, E.
  • Climates: Mediterranean (Csa, Csb). Temperate (C).
  • Cropping Systems: Fruit. Cover cropping. Irrigated cropping systems. Conservation cropping systems. No-till cropping systems. Till cropping systems. Vegetables.
  • Countries: USA.

Summary

The efficacy of no-till systems in conserving soil moisture and improving water infiltration under furrow irrigation was evaluated during 1997 and 1998 in California, USA. Two grass/legume mixtures, i.e. triticale/lana woolypod vetch (* Triticosecale/ Vicia dasycarpa [ V. villosa]) and rye/lana woolypod vetch ( Secale cereale/ V. dasycarpa), were used as cover cop mulches in no-till treatments, and compared with a winter fallow treatment with pre-plant herbicide (fallow +h) and a fallow control treatment with no herbicide (fallow -h). Tomato cv. Halley 3155 plants were transplanted in April 1997 and 1998, sprinkle irrigated during the first 6 weeks after transplanting, and furrow irrigated thereafter until 3 weeks before harvest. During 1997, soil water content between 0 and 78 inches did not differ among treatments, while soil water content during the 1997/98 winter was higher under the fallow +h than the cover crop treatments until cover crop termination. Soil water content of cover crop treatments in shallower soil layers (18 and 42 inches) was significantly lower than fallow treatments at the end of the winter. During the 1998 tomato crop season, soil water content between 0 and 90 inches was greater under the triticale and rye mulches than the fallow +h, beginning the 3rd week after furrow irrigations were started. Soil moisture in the shallower layers was also affected by cover crop mulches. In the 42-inch depth increment, there was significantly higher water content under the cover crops than under the fallow +h from about 1 month after the first furrow irrigation until 2 weeks before the last irrigation. Changes in soil water content during furrow irrigation under the fallow +h treatment appeared to be more pronounced than under the triticale or rye surface mulches. Soil compaction in the fallow +h treatment was higher than under the cover crop mulches for most of the 0.6-inch intervals, especially below 1 foot, but differences were significantly higher only for the 3, 3.6, 4.2, 17, 18, and 24-inch depth, but lower from the surface to 2.4 inches. Soil carbon was significantly higher (by 14 and 18%) under triticale and rye, respectively, compared with the fallow +h treatment. The number of earthworms was also higher in no-till (2.1 earthworms per square foot) than in the fallow treatments (0.6 earthworms). Tomato canopy growth did not reach 100% cover in either 1997 or 1998, while tomato plant growth, assessed by measuring the photosynthetically active radiation intercepted by the canopy, did not differ in the triticale, rye, and fallow +h system in either 1997 or 1998. Results showed that the no-till mulch system enhanced water infiltration and soil water conservation.

Full Text Link