Citation Information

  • Title : Physical indicators of sustainability - a farming systems approach for the small farmer in the rainfed vertisols of the western zone of Tamil Nadu.
  • Source : Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
  • Publisher : Taylor & Francis
  • Volume : 25
  • Issue : 3
  • Pages : 43-65
  • Year : 2005
  • DOI : 10.1300/J064v25n
  • ISBN : 10.1300/J064v25n03_04
  • Document Type : Journal Article
  • Language : English
  • Authors:
    • Jayanthi, C.
    • Shekinah, D. E.
    • Sankaran, N.
  • Climates: Tropical (A). Temperate (C). Tropical monsoonal (Am). Tropical savannah (Aw). Humid subtropical (Cwa, Cfa).
  • Cropping Systems: Dryland cropping system. Grazing systems.
  • Countries: India.

Summary

In a small-scale resource-poor farm, modest increments in productivity are no longer sufficient to justify the investment of scarce resources. Integrated farming systems with multiple enterprises pave the way for realizing increased productivity, profitability and sustainability in small farms of the developing countries. A study conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India from July 2000 to March 2002 to optimize enterprise combination, increase employment and bring about maximum bioresource utilization and residue recycling for a 1-ha farm of the dryland tract of the western zone of Tamil Nadu compared four farming system combinations: FS 2 (crop+pigeon+goat+agroforestry+farm pond), FS 3 (crop+pigeon+buffalo+agroforestry+farm pond), and FS 4 (crop+pigeon+goat+buffalo+agroforestry+farm pond) with FS 1 (sorghum only) as the reference system. The results indicated the following: crop (0.80 ha) fertilized with buffalo manure produced on the farm, with pigeon (10 pairs on 0.01 ha), goat (5:1 female:male on 0.02 ha), buffalo (2 milking buffaloes+1 calf on 0.03 ha), agroforestry (0.10 ha) and farm pond (0.04 ha) was the profitable system enterprise that generated higher employment year-round. This system also facilitated the maximum recycling of resources and residues generated on the farm among the enterprises. The output and the waste of one enterprise served as input to another. The nutritive value of the system in terms of carbohydrate, protein and fat was also highest with this enterprise combination. Thus, FS 4 seems to be the best enterprise combination as revealed by the physical indicators. However, since the purchase and maintenance of buffalo enterprise involves higher costs, for farmers who have limited cash for investment, linkage of crop (0.80 ha) with pigeon (10 pairs on 0.01 ha), goat (5:1 female:male on 0.05 ha), agroforestry (0.10 ha) and farm pond (0.04 ha) is suggested as the alternative farming system for sustainability instead of conventional cropping alone.

Full Text Link