• Authors:
    • van Groenigen, K. J.
    • van Kessel, C.
    • Oenema, O.
    • Velthof, G. L.
    • van Groenigen, J. W.
  • Source: European Journal of Soil Science
  • Volume: 61
  • Issue: 6
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Agricultural soils are the main anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (N2O), largely because of nitrogen (N) fertilizer use. Commonly, N2O emissions are expressed as a function of N application rate. This suggests that smaller fertilizer applications always lead to smaller N2O emissions. Here we argue that, because of global demand for agricultural products, agronomic conditions should be included when assessing N2O emissions. Expressing N2O emissions in relation to crop productivity (expressed as above-ground N uptake: "yield-scaled N2O emissions") can express the N2O efficiency of a cropping system. We show how conventional relationships between N application rate, N uptake and N2O emissions can result in minimal yield-scaled N2O emissions at intermediate fertilizer-N rates. Key findings of a meta-analysis on yield-scaled N2O emissions by non-leguminous annual crops (19 independent studies and 147 data points) revealed that yield-scaled N2O emissions were smallest (8.4 g N2O-N kg-1N uptake) at application rates of approximately 180-190 kg Nha-1 and increased sharply after that (26.8 g N2O-N kg-1 N uptake at 301 kg N ha-1). If the above-ground N surplus was equal to or smaller than zero, yield-scaled N2O emissions remained stable and relatively small. At an N surplus of 90 kg N ha-1 yield-scaled emissions increased threefold. Furthermore, a negative relation between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N2O emissions was found. Therefore, we argue that agricultural management practices to reduce N2O emissions should focus on optimizing fertilizer-N use efficiency under median rates of N input, rather than on minimizing N application rates.
  • Authors:
    • Paré, D.
    • Angers, D. A.
    • Laganière, J.
  • Source: Global Change Biology
  • Volume: 16
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Deforestation usually results in significant losses of soil organic carbon (SOC). The rate and factors determining the recovery of this C pool with afforestation are still poorly understood. This paper provides a review of the influence of afforestation on SOC stocks based on a meta-analysis of 33 recent publications (totaling 120 sites and 189 observations), with the aim of determining the factors responsible for the restoration of SOC following afforestation. Based on a mixed linear model, the meta-analysis indicates that the main factors that contribute to restoring SOC stocks after afforestation are: previous land use, tree species planted, soil clay content, preplanting disturbance and, to a lesser extent, climatic zone. Specifically, this meta-analysis (1) indicates that the positive impact of afforestation on SOC stocks is more pronounced in cropland soils than in pastures or natural grasslands; (2) suggests that broadleaf tree species have a greater capacity to accumulate SOC than coniferous species; (3) underscores that afforestation using pine species does not result in a net loss of the whole soil-profile carbon stocks compared with initial values (agricultural soil) when the surface organic layer is included in the accounting; (4) demonstrates that clay-rich soils (>33%) have a greater capacity to accumulate SOC than soils with a lower clay content (<33%); (5) indicates that minimizing preplanting disturbances may increase the rate at which SOC stocks are replenished; and (6) suggests that afforestation carried out in the boreal climate zone results in small SOC losses compared with other climate zones, probably because trees grow more slowly under these conditions, although this does not rule out gains over time after the conversion. This study also highlights the importance of the methodological approach used when developing the sampling design, especially the inclusion of the organic layer in the accounting.
  • Authors:
    • Saggar, S.
    • de Klein, C. A. M.
    • Ledgard, S. F.
    • Luo, J.
  • Source: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
  • Volume: 136
  • Issue: 3-4
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from grazed pastures represent a significant source of atmospheric N2O. With an improved understanding and quantification of N sources, transformation processes, and soil and climatic conditions controlling N2O emissions, a number of management options can be identified to reduce N2O emissions from grazed pasture systems. The mitigation options discussed in this paper are: optimum soil management, limiting the amount of N fertiliser or effluent applied when soil is wet; lowering the amount of N excreted in animal urine by using low-N feed supplements as an alternative to fertiliser N-boosted grass; plant and animal selection for increased N use efficiency, using N process inhibitors that inhibit the conversion of urea to ammonium and ammonium to nitrate in soil; use of stand-off/feed pads or housing systems during high risk periods of N loss. The use of single or multiple mitigation options always needs to be evaluated in a whole farm system context and account for total greenhouse gas emissions including methane and carbon dioxide. They should focus on ensuring overall efficiency gains through decreasing N losses per unit of animal production and achieving a tighter N cycle. Whole-system life-cycle-based environmental analysis should also be conducted to assess overall environmental emissions associated the N2O mitigation options. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Authors:
    • Sun, O. J.
    • Wang, E. L.
    • Luo, Z. K.
  • Source: Geoderma
  • Volume: 155
  • Issue: 3-4
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Soil is the largest reservoir of carbon (C) in the terrestrial biosphere and a slight variation in this pool could lead to Substantial changes in the atmospheric CO2 concentration, thus impact significantly on the global climate. Cultivation of natural ecosystems has led to marked decline in soil C storage, such that conservation agricultural practices (CAPs) are widely recommended as options to increase soil C storage, thereby mitigating climate change. In this review, we summarise soil C change as a result of cultivation worldwide and in Australia. We then combine the available data to examine the effects of adopting CAPs on soil C dynamics in Australian agro-ecosystems. Finally, we discuss the future research priorities related to soil C dynamics. The available data show that in Australian agro-ecosystems, cultivation has led to C loss for more than 40 years, with a total C loss of approximately 51% in the surface 0.1 m of soil. Adoption of CAPs generally increased soil C. Introducing perennial plants into rotation had the greatest potential to increase soil C by 18% compared with other CAPs. However, the same CAPS Could result in different outcomes on soil C under different climate and soil combinations. No consistent trend of increase in soil C was found with the duration of CAP applications, implying that questions remain regarding long-term impact of CAPs. Most of the available data in Australia are limited to the surface 0.1 to 0.3 m of soil. Efforts are needed to investigate soil C change in deeper soil layers in Order to understand the impact of crop root growth and various agricultural practices on C distribution in soil profile. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration, global warming and rainfall change Could all alter the C balance of agricultural soils. Because of the complexity of soil C response to management and environmental factors, a system modelling approach Supported by sound experimental data would provide the most effective means to analyse the impact of different management practices and future climate change on soil C dynamics. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Authors:
    • Sun, O. J.
    • Wang, E.
    • Luo, Z.
  • Source: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
  • Volume: 139
  • Issue: 1-2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Adopting no-tillage in agro-ecosystems has been widely recommended as a means of enhancing carbon (C) sequestration in soils. However, study results are inconsistent and varying from significant increase to significant decrease. It is unclear whether this variability is caused by environmental, or management factors or by sampling errors and analysis methodology. Using meta-analysis, we assessed the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) to conversion of management practice from conventional tillage (CT) to no-tillage (NT) based on global data from 69 paired-experiments, where soil sampling extended deeper than 40 cm. We found that cultivation of natural soils for more than 5 years, on average, resulted in soil C loss of more than 20 t ha-1, with no significant difference between CT and NT. Conversion from CT to NT changed distribution of C in the soil profile significantly, but did not increase the total SOC except in double cropping systems. After adopting NT, soil C increased by 3.15 +- 2.42 t ha-1 (mean ± 95% confidence interval) in the surface 10 cm of soil, but declined by 3.30 ± 1.61 t ha-1 in the 20-40 cm soil layer. Overall, adopting NT did not enhance soil total C stock down to 40 cm. Increased number of crop species in rotation resulted in less C accumulation in the surface soil and greater C loss in deeper layer. Increased crop frequency seemed to have the opposite effect and significantly increased soil C by 11% in the 0-60 cm soil. Neither mean annual temperature and mean annual rainfall nor nitrogen fertilization and duration of adopting NT affected the response of soil C stock to the adoption of NT. Our results highlight that the role of adopting NT in sequestrating C is greatly regulated by cropping systems. Increasing cropping frequency might be a more efficient strategy to sequester C in agro-ecosystems. More information on the effects of increasing crop species and frequency on soil C input and decomposition processes is needed to further our understanding on the potential ability of C sequestration in agricultural soils.
  • Authors:
    • Yagi, K.
    • Nakajima, Y.
    • Sawamoto, T.
    • Nishimura, S.
    • Minamikawa, K.
  • Source: Global Change Biology
  • Volume: 16
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Abstract: Indirect emission of nitrous oxide (N2O), associated with nitrogen (N) leaching and runoff from agricultural lands is a major source of atmospheric N2O. Recent studies have shown that carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) are also emitted via these pathways. We measured the concentrations of three dissolved greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the subsurface drainage from field lysimeter that had a shallow groundwater table. Above-ground fluxes of CH4 and N2O were monitored using an automated closed-chamber system. The annual total emissions of dissolved and aboveground GHGs were compared among three cropping systems; paddy rice, soybean and wheat, and upland rice. The annual drainage in the paddy rice, the soybean and wheat, and the upland rice plots was 1435, 782, and 1010mmyr -1, respectively. Dissolved CO2 emissions were highest in the paddy rice plots, and were equivalent to 1.05-1.16% of the carbon storage in the topsoil. Dissolved CH4 emissions were also higher in the paddy rice plots, but were only 0.03-0.05% of the aboveground emissions. Dissolved N2O emissions were highest in the upland rice plots, where leached N was greatest due to small crop biomass. In the soybean and wheat plots, large crop biomass, due to double cropping, decreased the drainage volume, and thus decreased dissolved GHG emissions. Dissolved N2O emissions from both the soybean and wheat plots and the upland rice plots were equivalent to 50.3-67.3% of the aboveground emissions. The results indicate that crop type and rotation are important factors in determining dissolved GHG emissions in the drainage from a crop field.
  • Authors:
    • Jenkins, W. A.
    • Kramer, R. A.
    • Elsin, Y. K.
  • Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
  • Volume: 136
  • Year: 2010
  • Authors:
    • Franzluebbers,A. J.
  • Source: Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Volume: 74
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Conservation management of degraded land has the potential to build soil fertility, restore soil functions, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of surface soil organic matter accumulation. Literature from the southeastern United States was reviewed and synthesized to: (i) quantitatively evaluate the magnitude and rate of soil organic C (SOC) sequestration with conservation agricultural management; (ii) evaluate how conservation management affects surface SOC accumulation and its implications on ecosystem services; and (iii) recommend practical soil sampling strategies based on spatial and temporal issues to improve the detection of statistically significant SOC sequestration. Soil organic C sequestration was 0.45 ± 0.04 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 (mean ± standard error, n = 147, 20 ± 1 cm depth, 11 ± 1 yr) with conservation tillage compared with conventional tillage cropland. Establishment of perennial pastures sequestered 0.84 ± 0.11 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 (n = 35, 25 ± 2 cm depth, 17 ± 1 yr). Stratification of SOC with depth was common under conservation agricultural management and appears to be integrally linked to abatement of soil erosion, improvement in water quality, and SOC sequestration. Sampling of conservation management systems should ideally occur repeatedly with time in controlled and replicated experiments, but there is also an urgent need for chronosequence and paired-field surveys of SOC on working farms in the region to validate and expand the scope of inference of experimental results. Landowners in the southeastern United States have great potential to restore soil fertility and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions with the adoption of and improvement in conservation agricultural systems (e.g., continuous no-till, high-residue crop rotations, high organic matter inputs).
  • Authors:
    • Franzluebbers, A. J.
  • Year: 2010
  • Authors:
    • Franzluebbers, A. J.
  • Source: Soil Organic Matter and Nutrient Cycling to Sustain Agriculture in the Southeastern USA
  • Year: 2010