• Authors:
    • Ghosh, P. K.
    • Das, A.
    • Saha, R.
    • Kharkrang, E.
    • Tripathi, A. K.
    • Munda, G. C.
    • Ngachan, S. V.
  • Source: Current Science
  • Volume: 99
  • Issue: 7
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Productivity of rainfed monocropping farming system in North Eastern Region of India is low and it is a high economic risk activity. Intensive natural resources mining, continuous degradation of natural resources (soil, water, vegetation) and practice of monocropping under conventional agricultural practices will not ensure farm productivity and food security in the coming years. In order to keep the production system in different land situations sustainable, conservation agriculture based on no-till system is an alternative to reconcile agriculture with its environment and overcome the imposed constraints of climate change and continuous inputs cost. Studies on conservation tillage and residue management in different land situations were conducted during 2006-2009 and they are highlighted in this article. In terrace upland, growing mustard completely on residual moisture following upland rice/maize was possible when it is practised under conservation tillage (crop residue of all crops, including weed biomass incorporated). Similarly, in valley upland, growing second crop of pea in rice fallow is possible if two-thirds or half of rice residues are retained on the soil surface under zero tillage. A long-term study (2006-2009) revealed that double no-till practice in rice-based system is cost-effective, restored soil organic carbon (70.75%), favoured biological activity (46.7%), conserved water and produced yield (49%) higher than conventional tillage. Therefore, conservation tillage practised in terrace upland, valley upland and low-land situations ensured double-cropping, improved farm income and livelihood in rainfed NE India.
  • Authors:
    • Committee on the Impact of Biotechnology on Farm-Level Economics and Sustainability
    • National Research Council
  • Year: 2010
  • Authors:
    • Pollack, A.
    • Neuman, W.
  • Source: The New York Times
  • Volume: 4 May
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: A 2010 article in the New York times about Round-Up resistant weeds in the United States.
  • Authors:
    • Ochsner, T. E.
    • Venterea, R. T.
  • Source: Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Volume: 74
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Quantifying N2O emissions from corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] fields under different fertilizer regimes is essential to developing national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions. The objective of this study was to compare N2O emissions in plots managed for more than 15 yr under continuous corn (C/C) vs. a corn-soybean (C/S) rotation that were fertilized during the corn phase with either anhydrous NH3 (AA) or urea (U). During three growing seasons, N2O emissions from corn following corn were nearly identical to corn following soybean. In both systems, however, N2O emissions with AA were twice the emissions with U. After accounting for N2O emissions during the soybean phase, it was estimated that a shift from C/S to C/C would result in an increase in annual emissions of 0.78 kg N ha-1 (equivalent to 0.11 Mg CO2-C ha-1) when AA was used, compared with only 0.21 kg N ha-1 (0.03 Mg CO2-C ha-1) with U. In light of trends toward increased use of U, these results suggest that fertilizer-induced soil N2O emissions may decline in the future, at least per unit of applied N, although further study is needed in different soils and cropping systems. While soil CO2 emissions were 20% higher under C/C, crop residue from the prior year did not affect soil inorganic N or dissolved organic C during the subsequent season. We also compared different flux-calculation schemes, including a new method for correcting chamber-induced errors, and found that selection of a calculation method altered N2O emissions estimates by as much as 35%.
  • Authors:
    • Sun, O. J.
    • Wang, E.
    • Luo, Z.
  • Source: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
  • Volume: 139
  • Issue: 1-2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Adopting no-tillage in agro-ecosystems has been widely recommended as a means of enhancing carbon (C) sequestration in soils. However, study results are inconsistent and varying from significant increase to significant decrease. It is unclear whether this variability is caused by environmental, or management factors or by sampling errors and analysis methodology. Using meta-analysis, we assessed the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) to conversion of management practice from conventional tillage (CT) to no-tillage (NT) based on global data from 69 paired-experiments, where soil sampling extended deeper than 40 cm. We found that cultivation of natural soils for more than 5 years, on average, resulted in soil C loss of more than 20 t ha-1, with no significant difference between CT and NT. Conversion from CT to NT changed distribution of C in the soil profile significantly, but did not increase the total SOC except in double cropping systems. After adopting NT, soil C increased by 3.15 +- 2.42 t ha-1 (mean ± 95% confidence interval) in the surface 10 cm of soil, but declined by 3.30 ± 1.61 t ha-1 in the 20-40 cm soil layer. Overall, adopting NT did not enhance soil total C stock down to 40 cm. Increased number of crop species in rotation resulted in less C accumulation in the surface soil and greater C loss in deeper layer. Increased crop frequency seemed to have the opposite effect and significantly increased soil C by 11% in the 0-60 cm soil. Neither mean annual temperature and mean annual rainfall nor nitrogen fertilization and duration of adopting NT affected the response of soil C stock to the adoption of NT. Our results highlight that the role of adopting NT in sequestrating C is greatly regulated by cropping systems. Increasing cropping frequency might be a more efficient strategy to sequester C in agro-ecosystems. More information on the effects of increasing crop species and frequency on soil C input and decomposition processes is needed to further our understanding on the potential ability of C sequestration in agricultural soils.
  • Authors:
    • Robertson, G. P.
    • Grace, P. R.
    • Bohm, S.
    • McSwiney, C. P.
  • Source: Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
  • Volume: 39
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Opportunities for farmers to participate in greenhouse gas (GHG) credit markets require that growers, students, extension educators, offset aggregators, and other stakeholders understand the impact of agricultural practices on GHG emissions. The Farming Systems Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator, a web-based tool linked to the SOCRATES soil carbon process model, provides a simple introduction to the concepts and magnitudes of gas emissions associated with crop management. Users choose a county of interest on an introductory screen and are taken to the input/output window, where they choose crops, yields, tillage practices, or nitrogen fertilizer rates. Default values are provided based on convention and county averages. Outputs include major contributors of greenhouse gases in field crops: soil carbon change, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, fuel use, and fertilizer. We contrast conventional tillage and no-till in a corn-soybean-wheat (Zea mays L.-Glycine max (L.) Merr.-Triticum aestivum L.) rotation and compare continuous corn fertilized at 101 and 134 kg N ha-1 yr-1. In corn years, N2O was the dominant GHG, due to high fertilizer requirements for corn. No-till management reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 50% due to net soil carbon storage. Continuous corn fertilized at 101 kg N ha-1 yr-1 emitted 1.25 Mg CO2 equivalents ha-1 yr-1 compared with 1.42 Mg CO2 equivalents ha-1 yr-1 at 134 kg N ha-1 yr-1, providing a 12% GHG savings. The calculator demonstrates how cropping systems and management choices affect greenhouse gas emissions in field crops.
  • Authors:
    • Hoben, J. P.
    • Gehl, R. J.
    • Grace, P. R.
    • Robertson, G. P.
    • Millar, N.
  • Source: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
  • Volume: 15
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a major greenhouse gas (GHG) product of intensive agriculture. Fertilizer nitrogen (N) rate is the best single predictor of N2O emissions in row-crop agriculture in the US Midwest. We use this relationship to propose a transparent, scientifically robust protocol that can be utilized by developers of agricultural offset projects for generating fungible GHG emission reduction credits for the emerging US carbon cap and trade market. By coupling predicted N2O flux with the recently developed maximum return to N (MRTN) approach for determining economically profitable N input rates for optimized crop yield, we provide the basis for incentivizing N2O reductions without affecting yields. The protocol, if widely adopted, could reduce N2O from fertilized row-crop agriculture by more than 50%. Although other management and environmental factors can influence N2O emissions, fertilizer N rate can be viewed as a single unambiguous proxy--a transparent, tangible, and readily manageable commodity. Our protocol addresses baseline establishment, additionality, permanence, variability, and leakage, and provides for producers and other stakeholders the economic and environmental incentives necessary for adoption of agricultural N2O reduction offset projects.
  • Authors:
    • Yagi, K.
    • Nakajima, Y.
    • Sawamoto, T.
    • Nishimura, S.
    • Minamikawa, K.
  • Source: Global Change Biology
  • Volume: 16
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Abstract: Indirect emission of nitrous oxide (N2O), associated with nitrogen (N) leaching and runoff from agricultural lands is a major source of atmospheric N2O. Recent studies have shown that carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) are also emitted via these pathways. We measured the concentrations of three dissolved greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the subsurface drainage from field lysimeter that had a shallow groundwater table. Above-ground fluxes of CH4 and N2O were monitored using an automated closed-chamber system. The annual total emissions of dissolved and aboveground GHGs were compared among three cropping systems; paddy rice, soybean and wheat, and upland rice. The annual drainage in the paddy rice, the soybean and wheat, and the upland rice plots was 1435, 782, and 1010mmyr -1, respectively. Dissolved CO2 emissions were highest in the paddy rice plots, and were equivalent to 1.05-1.16% of the carbon storage in the topsoil. Dissolved CH4 emissions were also higher in the paddy rice plots, but were only 0.03-0.05% of the aboveground emissions. Dissolved N2O emissions were highest in the upland rice plots, where leached N was greatest due to small crop biomass. In the soybean and wheat plots, large crop biomass, due to double cropping, decreased the drainage volume, and thus decreased dissolved GHG emissions. Dissolved N2O emissions from both the soybean and wheat plots and the upland rice plots were equivalent to 50.3-67.3% of the aboveground emissions. The results indicate that crop type and rotation are important factors in determining dissolved GHG emissions in the drainage from a crop field.
  • Authors:
    • Six, J.
    • Lee, J.
    • Temple, S. R.
    • Rolston, D. E.
    • Mitchell, J.
    • Kaffka, S. R.
    • Wolf, A.
    • De Gryze, S.
  • Source: Ecological Applications
  • Volume: 20
  • Issue: 7
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Despite the importance of agriculture in California's Central Valley, the potential of alternative management practices to reduce soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been poorly studied in California. This study aims at (1) calibrating and validating DAYCENT, an ecosystem model, for conventional and alternative cropping systems in California's Central Valley, (2) estimating CO2, N2O and CH4 soil fluxes from these systems, and (3) quantifying the uncertainty around model predictions induced by variability in the input data. The alternative practices considered were cover cropping, organic practices, and conservation tillage. These practices were compared with conventional agricultural management. The crops considered were beans, corn, cotton, safflower, sunflower, tomato, and wheat. Four field sites for which at least five years of measured data were available, were used to calibrate and validate the DAYCENT model. The model was able to predict 86% to 94% of the measured variation in crop yields and 69% to 87% of the measured variation in soil organic carbon (SOC) contents. A Monte-Carlo analysis showed that the predicted variability of SOC contents, crop yields and N2O fluxes was generally smaller than the measured variability of these parameters, in particular for N2O fluxes. Conservation tillage had the smallest potential to reduce GHG emissions among the alternative practices evaluated, with a significant reduction of the net soil GHG fluxes in two of the three sites of 336 ± 47 (mean ± standard error) and 550 ± 123 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1. Cover cropping had a larger potential, with net soil GHG flux reductions of 752 ± 10, 1072 ± 272 and 2201 ± 82 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1. Organic practices had the greatest potential for soil GHG flux reduction, with 4577 ± 272 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1. Annual differences in weather or management conditions contributed more to the variance in annual GHG emissions than soil variability did. We concluded that the DAYCENT model was successful at predicting GHG emissions of different alternative management systems in California, but that a sound error analysis must accompany the predictions to understand the risks and potentials of GHG mitigation through adoption of alternative practices.
  • Authors:
    • Ogle, S.
    • Del Grosso, S.
    • Delgado, J.
  • Source: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
  • Volume: 86
  • Issue: 3
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: It is difficult to quantify nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural systems; however, we can use 15N isotopic techniques to conduct site-specific studies to increase our knowledge about N management and fate. Our manuscript analyzes two reviews of selected 15N isotopic studies conducted to monitor N fate. The mechanistic foci of these studies include crop residue exchange and N fate in farming systems. Analysis of the data presented in these studies supports the claim that the average N losses are greater from inorganic N fertilizer inputs than organic crop residue N inputs. Additionally we conducted unique DAYCENT simulations of the effects of crop residue on nitrous oxide (N2O-N) emissions and nitrate (NO3-N) leaching. The simulation evaluations support the crop residue 15N exchange studies and show lower leaching and N2O-N emissions from crop residue sources when compared to N fertilizer. The 15N data suggest that the N in the crop residue pool must be recycled, and that this is a slower and more protected pool when compared to the readily available fertilizer. The results suggest that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology should be reevaluated to determine whether the direct and indirect N2O-N emission coefficients need to be lowered to reflect fewer N2O-N emissions from high C/N crop residue N inputs. The data suggest that accounting for nutrient cycling has implications for public policy associated with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and mitigation of N2O-N emissions from agricultural soils. Additional crop residue exchange studies, field N2O-N and NO3-N leaching and support model evaluations are needed across different worldwide agroecosystems.