• Authors:
    • Andrasko, K.
    • Bosquet, B.
  • Year: 2010
  • Authors:
    • Schulze, E. D.
    • Houwelling, S.
    • Rivier, L.
    • Friedrich, R.
    • Scholz, Y.
    • Pregger, T.
    • Levin, I.
    • Piao, S. L.
    • Peylin, P.
    • Marland, G.
    • Paris, J. D.
    • Ciais, P.
  • Source: Global Change Biology
  • Volume: 16
  • Issue: 5
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: We analyzed the magnitude, the trends and the uncertainties of fossil-fuel CO2 emissions in the European Union 25 member states (hereafter EU-25), based on emission inventories from energy-use statistics. The stability of emissions during the past decade at EU-25 scale masks decreasing trends in some regions, offset by increasing trends elsewhere. In the recent 4 years, the new Eastern EU-25 member states have experienced an increase in emissions, reversing after a decade-long decreasing trend. Mediterranean and Nordic countries have also experienced a strong acceleration in emissions. In Germany, France and United Kingdom, the stability of emissions is due to the decrease in the industry sector, offset by an increase in the transportation sector. When four different inventories models are compared, we show that the between-models uncertainty is as large as 19% of the mean for EU-25, and even bigger for individual countries. Accurate accounting for fossil CO2 emissions depends on a clear understanding of system boundaries, i.e. emitting activities included in the accounting. We found that the largest source of errors between inventories is the use of distinct systems boundaries (e.g. counting or not bunker fuels, cement manufacturing, non-energy products). Once these inconsistencies are corrected, the between-models uncertainty can be reduced down to 7% at EU-25 scale. The uncertainty of emissions at smaller spatial scales than the country scale was analyzed by comparing two emission maps based upon distinct economic and demographic activities. A number of spatial and temporal biases have been found among the two maps, indicating a significant increase in uncertainties when increasing the resolution at scales finer than ~200 km. At 100 km resolution, for example, the uncertainty of regional emissions is estimated to be 60 g C m-2 yr-1, up to 50% of the mean. The uncertainty on regional fossil-fuel CO2 fluxes to the atmosphere could be reduced by making accurate 14C measurements in atmospheric CO2, and by combining them with transport models.
  • Authors:
    • Thorup-Kristensen, K.
    • Dresboll, D. B.
  • Source: Soil Use and Management
  • Volume: 26
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: The significance of incorporation date of a catch crop on the nitrogen supply for the subsequent crop, the N effect (N(eff)), was examined. Winter rye was grown as a catch crop for 3 years during the autumn, and incorporated on five dates, two in the autumn and three in the spring. Two of the winters had high precipitation, and the N(eff) was small at the early autumn incorporation date, but increased when incorporation was delayed into late autumn and further increased by early spring incorporation. In the third winter, which was very dry, the N(eff) was negative at all incorporation dates, with the negative effect gradually increasing in value the later the incorporation date. In all 3 years the N(eff) was reduced when incorporation was delayed from early spring until later in the spring. The main processes determining this pattern were found to be (1) the risk of leaching of N mineralized after catch crop incorporation, which can reduce the N(eff) at early incorporation under wet conditions, (2) pre-emptive competition which can reduce the N(eff) when incorporation is delayed until later in the spring, and in dry conditions is already apparent during the autumn, and (3) catch crop growth leading to carbon gain and increased C/N ratio which decreases mineralization and thus the N(eff) after delayed incorporation in the spring. Lack of time for catch crop N uptake prior to early incorporation, or lack of time for N mineralization after late incorporation which might also reduce the N(eff) did not appear to be important in our experiment. The results show that catch crops grown in high rainfall areas on sandy soils should be incorporated later than those in low rainfall areas on nitrate retentive soils.
  • Authors:
    • Melander, B.
    • Munkholm, L. J.
    • Hansen, E. M.
    • Olesen, J. E.
  • Source: Soil & Tillage Research
  • Volume: 109
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Finding ways of reducing nitrate leaching in Northern Europe has become an extremely important task, especially under the projected climate changes that are expected to exacerbate the problem. To this end, two field experiments were established under temperate coastal climate conditions to evaluate the effect of tillage, straw retainment and cropping sequences, including cover crops, on nitrate leaching. The experiments were established in autumn 2002 on a loamy sand with 92 g clay kg(-1) and a sandy loam with 147 g clay kg(-1). The tillage treatments were stubble cultivation to 8-10 cm or 3-4 cm, direct drilling, or ploughing to 20 cm. The hypothesis was that (i) decreasing soil tillage intensity would decrease leaching compared to ploughing, (ii) leaving straw in the field would decrease leaching compared to removing straw, and (iii) a spring/winter crop rotation with catch crops would be more efficient in reducing nitrate leaching than a winter crop rotation. Overall, we were not able to confirm the three hypotheses. The effect of soil tillage on leaching might be blurred because the studied crop rotations had a high proportion of winter crops and because catch crops were grown whenever the alternative would have been bare soil in autumn and winter. The spring/winter crop rotation with catch crops was not found to be more efficient in reducing nitrate leaching than the winter crop rotation. In contrast, in a single year the winter crop rotation showed significantly lower leaching than the spring/winter crop rotations, probably due to the spring/winter crop rotation including peas, which may be considered a high-risk crop. Our study highlights that management practices that improve biomass production throughout the year are crucial in order to tighten the nitrogen cycle and thereby reduce nitrate leaching. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Authors:
    • Gundersen, H.
    • Nielsen, H. H.
    • Rasmussen, J.
  • Source: WEED SCIENCE
  • Volume: 57
  • Issue: 3
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: POST weed harrowing and other cultivation methods to control weeds in early crop growth stages may result in crop damage due to low selectivity between crop and weeds. Crop tolerance to cultivation plays an important role but it has not been clearly defined and analyzed. We introduce a procedure for analyzing crop tolerance on the basis of digital image analysis. Crop tolerance is defined as the ability of the crop to avoid yield loss from cultivation in the absence of weeds, and it has two components: resistance and recovery. Resistance is the ability of the crop to resist soil covering and recovery is the ability to recover from it. Soil covering is the percentage of the crop that has been buried because of cultivation. We analyzed data from six field experiments, four experiments with species of small grains, barley, oat, wheat, and triticale, and two experiments with barley cultivars with different abilities to suppress weeds. The order of species' tolerance to weed harrowing was triticale > wheat > barley > oat and the differences were mainly caused by different abilities to recover from soil covering. At 25% soil covering, grain yield loss in triticale was 0.5%, in wheat 2.5%, in barley 3.7%, and in oat 6.5%. Tolerance, resistance, and recovery, however, were influenced by year, especially for oat and barley. There was no evidence of differences between barley cultivars in terms of tolerance indicating that differences among species are more important than differences among cultivars. Selectivity analysis made it possible to calculate the crop yield loss due to crop damage associated with a certain percentage of weed control. In triticale, 80% weed control was associated with 22% crop soil cover on average, which reduced grain yield 0.4% on average in the absence of weeds. Corresponding values for wheat, barley, and oat were 23, 21, and 20% crop soil cover and 2.3, 3.6, and 5.1% grain yield loss.
  • Authors:
    • Christensen, B. T.
    • Jensen, L. S.
    • Bruun, S.
    • Thomsen, I. K.
  • Source: Soil Biology & Biochemistry
  • Volume: 41
  • Issue: 10
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: The feasibility of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for quantifying labile organic matter (OM) in arable soils and for predicting soil refractory OM fractions was tested on 37 soils varying in texture and soil carbon (C) content. Three sets of arable soils (0-20 cm depth) were sampled from 1) long-term field experiments with different OM inputs, 2) individual sites with inherent with-in field gradients in soil texture and/or C content, and 3) from a range of different sites covering variations in management and geological origin. The labile OM fraction was defined by the CO2 evolved from the soils incubated for 34 weeks while refractory CM was obtained by NaOCl oxidation. The labile fraction of the soil C accounted for 2-12% of the total soil C content. No systematic relationship between labile C content and total soil C or clay was found, but NIR spectra could be correlated well with the labile C fraction. A distinct, close linear relationship was found for C in soil before and after the NaOCl oxidation, indicating that this method was unable to reveal any additional information not contained in the total soil C measurement. NIR was also correlated with the NaOCl resistant C fraction, but this was considered to relate to the ability of NIR to predict total soil C contents. Thus NIR seemed to have the potential to estimate labile OM determined under laboratory incubations, while it still remains open how to identify and quantify refractory pools of soil OM.
  • Authors:
    • Sousa, P.
    • Hansen, M. N.
    • Blanes-Vidal, V.
  • Source: Journal of Environmental Quality
  • Volume: 38
  • Issue: 4
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: Swine (Sus scrofa) slurry stored in open storages is a source of airborne contaminants. A customary practice for ammonia and odor control consists of covering the surface of the slurry with floating materials, such as straw. Although straw covers have been proven to generally reduce gaseous emissions, more knowledge is needed regarding how age, moisture content, and microbiological development of the straw cover affect the emissions of odor and odorants to develop recommendations for the practical use of straw covers. This study compiles data on odor concentration and odorants above swine slurry covered by straw of different ages and moisture contents, during a 9 wk laboratory scale study. The results showed that aged straw covers significantly reduced emissions of ammonia (by 99%), dimethyl sulfide (by 81%), phenol (82%), p-cresol (by 95%), skatole (by 98%), and benzylalcohol (by 97%), while no significant differences were found between uncovered and covered slurry for emission of odor, hydrogen sulfide, volatile fatty acids, dimethyl disulfide, and indole. The moisture content of the straw cover neither affected emissions of odor nor odorants. This study suggests that the main mechanism for odor and odorants emission reduction from straw covered slurry is as a physical barrier and not as a biofilter. However, the reduction in emissions of specific gases (such as ammonia, dimethyl sulfide, p-cresol, and benzyl alcohol) appears to be also caused by the straw cover acting as a biofilter.
  • Authors:
    • Pedersen, J. B.
  • Source: Oversigt over Landsfors<o>gene. Fors<o>g og unders<o>gelser i de land<o>konomiske foreninger, 2008
  • Year: 2008
  • Summary: Following a general account of the weather, land use, application of fertilizers and pest and disease control products, and an overview of the crops grown and their yields, most of the review is devoted to reports on individual crops. These were winter barley, winter rye, triticale, winter wheat, spring barley, oats, spring wheat, peas, grasses, spinach, rape, potatoes, sugarbeet and maize. Other sections cover alternative crops (for bioenergy production), manuring and fertilizers, cultural methods, organic methods, advisory work on plant breeding, tables of approved species and varieties of crop plants, lists of relevant organizations, a list of authors of the sections, and a comprehensive subject index.
  • Authors:
    • Pedersen, J. B.
  • Source: Oversigt over Landsfors<o>gene 2007. Fors<o>g og unders<o>gelser i de land<o>konomiske foreninger
  • Year: 2007
  • Summary: Work conducted by Landsforsgene, a collaborative body that undertakes field trials and experiments on crop plants in Denmark, is reported. A general introduction gives details of conditions in the 2007 growing season (warmer in spring and wetter than usual in summer), and their effects on factors such as the efficacy of fertilizer application and the harvest. The aim is to give growers a basis for future planning, taking account of environmental conditions and profitable plant production. Most of the report is devoted to separate sections covering individual crops: winter barley, winter rye, triticale, winter wheat, spring barley, oats, spring wheat, field peas, grass seeds, rape, hemp, spinach, strawberries, potatoes, sugar beet, pasture plants (grasses and clovers), and maize. Within these sections details of varieties, fertilizers, weeds, and diseases are provided in the text and in numerous tables and photographs. Other small sections deal with topics including organic production, fertilizers, plant breeding, statistical methods, policies, and names and addresses of suppliers. The report concludes with a list of the 23 authors of sections, and a comprehensive index.
  • Authors:
    • Valentini, R.
    • Tubaf, Z.
    • Sutton, M.
    • Manca, G.
    • Stefani, P.
    • Skiba, U.
    • Rees, R. M.
    • Baronti, S.
    • Raschi, A.
    • Neftel, A.
    • Nagy, Z.
    • Martin, C.
    • Kasper, G.
    • Jones, M.
    • Horvath, L.
    • Hensen, A.
    • Fuhrer, J.
    • Flechard, C.
    • Domingues, R.
    • Czobel, S.
    • Clifton-Brown, J.
    • Ceschia, E.
    • Campbell, C.
    • Amman, C.
    • Ambus, P.
    • Pilegaard, K.
    • Allard, V.
    • Soussana, J. F.
  • Source: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
  • Volume: 121
  • Issue: 1-2
  • Year: 2007
  • Summary: The full greenhouse gas balance of nine contrasted grassland sites covering a major climatic gradient over Europe was measured during two complete years. The sites include a wide range of management regimes (rotational grazing, continuous grazing and mowing), the three main types of managed grasslands across Europe (sown, intensive permanent and semi-natural grassland) and contrasted nitrogen fertilizer supplies. At all sites, the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 was assessed using the eddy covariance technique. N2O emissions were monitored using various techniques (GC-cuvette systems, automated chambers and tunable diode laser) and CH4 emissions resulting from enteric fermentation of the grazing cattle were measured in situ at four sites using the SF6 tracer method. Averaged over the two measurement years, net ecosystem exchange (NEE) results show that the nine grassland plots displayed a net sink for atmospheric CO2 of -240 +/- 70 g C m(-2) year(-1) (mean confidence interval at p > 0.95). Because of organic C exports (from cut and removed herbage) being usually greater than C imports (from manure spreading), the average C storage (net biome productivity, NBP) in the grassland plots was estimated at -104 +/- 73 g cm(-2) year(-1) that is 43% of the atmospheric CO2 sink. On average of the 2 years, the grassland plots displayed annual N2O and CH4 (from enteric fermentation by grazing cattle) emissions, in CO2-C equivalents, of 14 +/- 4.7 and 32 +/- 6.8 g CO2-C equiv. m(-2) year(-1), respectively. Hence, when expressed in CO2-C equivalents, emissions of N2O and CH4 resulted in a 19% offset of the NEE sink activity. An attributed GHG balance has been calculated by subtracting from the NBP: (i) N2O and CH4 emissions occurring within the grassland plot and (ii) off-site emissions of CO2 and CH4 as a result of the digestion and enteric fermentation by cattle of the cut herbage. On average of the nine sites, the attributed GHG balance was not significantly different from zero (-85 +/- 77 g CO2-C equiv. m(-2) year(-1)).