• Authors:
    • van Rensburg, L. D.
  • Source: South African Journal of Plant and Soil
  • Volume: 27
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: This is the third soil physics review to be published in South African Journal of Plant and Soil. In the previous reviews the focus was broad and covered almost every aspect of the subject, providing a comprehensive list of contributions in soil physics. For the 25th year anniversary celebration of South African Journal of Plant and Soil, I have chosen to narrow the scope and focus on advances in soil physics in relation to irrigation and dryland agriculture. From a bio-physical viewpoint, South African researchers have made a major contribution to the body of scientific knowledge about irrigation and its application, expressed mainly in the form of irrigation or crop models such as PUTU, SWB and BEWAB. Attention was also given to modern ways of irrigation scheduling based on continuous soil water monitoring. Several irrigation scheduling service providers have adapted their businesses accordingly, with the result that South Africa is probably the leading country in Africa with respect to soil water monitoring and associated communication technology. In contrast, the review has shown that at farm and irrigation scheme level, salt management requires urgent attention. This is necessary as a precautionary measure to protect our natural resources. In the second part of the review the contribution of soil physics in relation to tillage practices is explored, and in particular how these have modified the field water balance components in order to enhance yield and rain water productivity. Based on the results of field experiments, new relationships were established, viz, rainfall and maize yield; water storage and yield; runoff and surface coverage by crop residue mulches; tillage depth, texture and yield relationships. Lastly, the review also showed how the water balance on clay and duplex soils in semi-arid zones can be modified through in-field rainwater harvesting to increase their rain water productivity. This technology has enhanced the livelihoods of many communal families who have applied the technique in their homesteads.
  • Authors:
    • Satkus, A.
    • Velykis, A.
  • Source: Zemdirbyste-Agriculture
  • Volume: 97
  • Issue: 2
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Experiments were carried out during 2007-2009 at the Joniskelis Experimental Station of the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture on a clay loam Endocalcari-Endohypogleyic Cambisol (CMg-n-w-can). The study was designed to assess the effects of shallow ploughing and ploughless tillage as well as its combinations with other agronomic practices incorporation of lime sludge, cover crops (mixture of white mustard and oilseed radish) for green manure and mulch, improving soil condition and environment protection on the spread of weeds in a field pea crop and field pea productivity. It was found that when the post-sowing period was dry, reduced tillage of clay loam soil resulted in a higher weed incidence as well as a reduction in field pea yield, especially when leaving a cover crop for mulch during winter without tillage in autumn, as compared to deep ploughing. Under such conditions and due to reduced tillage, the spread of Galium aparine L. and Chenopodium album L. was wider, and in the cases of low field pea crop density as well as poor competition abilities, the mass of weeds increased. When the moisture was sufficient for field pea to emerge during post-sowing period, the spread of annual weeds was lower due to reduced tillage. Incorporation of lime sludge together with ploughless tillage helped to prevent the spread of weeds and reduction of field pea yield and was more favourable compared to ploughing.
  • Authors:
    • Rosolem, C. A.
    • Calonego, J. C.
  • Source: European Journal of Agronomy
  • Volume: 33
  • Issue: 3
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Compacted subsoil layers result in shallow root systems hindering the absorption of water and nutrients by plants. Disruption of soil compacted layers can be promoted by mechanical and/or biological methods, using plants with strong root systems. The immediate and medium term effects of mechanical chiseling and crop rotations on soybean root growth and yield were evaluated during four years in Brazil. Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) were grown in the autumn-winter (April-August). In the next spring (September-October/early November), designated plots were chiseled down to 0.25 m or planted to millet (Pennisetum glaucum L), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), grown as cover crops, preceding soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Chiseling was done only in the first year, and these plots were left fallow during the spring (September-October/early November) for the rest of the experiment. Chiseling resulted in lower soil penetration resistance and higher soybean yields in the first year. However, in the following years soybean root growth in depth was increased under rotation with triticale and pearl millet due to the presence of biopores and a decrease in soil penetration resistance. Soybean yields tended to decrease over the years in plots that were chiseled when compared with plots under crop rotation. Chiseling can be replaced by crop rotations involving species with aggressive root systems in order to alleviate deleterious effects of soil compaction on soybean yields in tropical soils. This effect is gradual, thus crop rotation will be fully effective in remediating soil compaction in a 3- to 4-year term. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Authors:
    • Petersen, J. L.
    • Melvin, S. R.
    • Irmak, S.
    • Martin, D. L.
    • Donk, S. J. van
    • Davison, D. R.
  • Source: Transactions of the ASABE
  • Volume: 53
  • Issue: 6
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Competition for water is becoming more intense in many parts of the U.S., including west-central Nebraska. It is believed that reduced tillage, with more crop residue on the soil surface, conserves water, but the magnitude of water conservation is not clear. A study was initiated on the effect of residue on soil water content and corn yield at North Platte, Nebraska. The experiment was conducted in 2007 and 2008 on plots planted to field corn ( Zea mays L.). In 2005 and 2006, soybean was grown on these plots. There were two treatments: residue-covered soil and bare soil. Bare-soil plots were created in April 2007. The residue plots were left untreated. In April 2008, bare-soil plots were recreated on the same plots as in 2007. The experiment consisted of eight plots (two treatments with four replications each). Each plot was 12.2 m * 12.2 m. During the growing season, soil water content was measured several times in each of the plots at six depths, down to a depth of 1.68 m, using a neutron probe. The corn crop was sprinkler-irrigated but purposely water-stressed, so that any water conservation in the residue-covered plots might translate into higher yields. In 2007, mean corn yield was 12.4 Mg ha -1 in the residue-covered plots, which was significantly (p=0.0036) greater than the 10.8 Mg ha -1 in the bare-soil plots. Other research has shown that it takes 65 to 100 mm of irrigation water to grow this extra 1.6 Mg ha -1, which may be considered water conservation due to the residue. In 2008, the residue-covered soil held approximately 60 mm more water in the top 1.83 m compared to the bare soil toward the end of the growing season. In addition, mean corn yield was 11.7 Mg ha -1 in the residue-covered plots, which was significantly (p=0.0165) greater than the 10.6 Mg ha -1 in the bare-soil plots. It would take 30 to 65 mm of irrigation water to produce this additional 1.1 Mg ha -1 of grain yield. Thus, the total amount of water conservation due to the residue was 90 to 125 mm in 2008. Water conservation of such a magnitude will help irrigators to reduce pumping cost. With deficit irrigation, water saved by evaporation is used for transpiration and greater yield, which may have even greater economic benefits. In addition, with these kinds of water conservation, more water would be available for competing needs.
  • Authors:
    • Hu, C. S.
    • Ren, T. S.
    • Du, Z. L.
  • Source: Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Volume: 74
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Little information is available about their influences of conservation tillage on the distribution and storage of soil organic C (SOC) and total N in soil profiles in the North China Plain. We investigated the changes in SOC and total N as related to the shift from conventional to conservation tillage using a long-term field experiment with a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)-corn ( Zea mays L.) double cropping system. The experiment included four tillage treatments for winter wheat: moldboard plow without corn residue return (MP-R), moldboard plow with corn residue return (MP+R), rotary tillage (RT), and no-till (NT). Compared with the MP-R treatment, returning crop residue to the soil (MP+R, RT, and NT) increased SOC and total N in the 0- to 30-cm soil layer, but no distinct changes in SOC and total N concentration were observed among the four treatments at soil depths >30 cm. Compared with the MP+R treatment, the RT and NT treatments increased SOC and total N concentration significantly in the 0- to 10-cm layer but decreased SOC and total N concentration in the 10- to 20-cm layers. As a consequence, soil profile SOC and total N storage did not vary among the MP+R, RT, and NT treatments. Thus under the experimental conditions, conservation tillage (RT and NT) increased SOC and total N contents in the upper soil layers, but did not increase SOC and total N storage over conventional tillage (MP+R) in the soil profile.
  • Authors:
    • Melander, B.
    • Munkholm, L. J.
    • Hansen, E. M.
    • Olesen, J. E.
  • Source: Soil & Tillage Research
  • Volume: 109
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Finding ways of reducing nitrate leaching in Northern Europe has become an extremely important task, especially under the projected climate changes that are expected to exacerbate the problem. To this end, two field experiments were established under temperate coastal climate conditions to evaluate the effect of tillage, straw retainment and cropping sequences, including cover crops, on nitrate leaching. The experiments were established in autumn 2002 on a loamy sand with 92 g clay kg(-1) and a sandy loam with 147 g clay kg(-1). The tillage treatments were stubble cultivation to 8-10 cm or 3-4 cm, direct drilling, or ploughing to 20 cm. The hypothesis was that (i) decreasing soil tillage intensity would decrease leaching compared to ploughing, (ii) leaving straw in the field would decrease leaching compared to removing straw, and (iii) a spring/winter crop rotation with catch crops would be more efficient in reducing nitrate leaching than a winter crop rotation. Overall, we were not able to confirm the three hypotheses. The effect of soil tillage on leaching might be blurred because the studied crop rotations had a high proportion of winter crops and because catch crops were grown whenever the alternative would have been bare soil in autumn and winter. The spring/winter crop rotation with catch crops was not found to be more efficient in reducing nitrate leaching than the winter crop rotation. In contrast, in a single year the winter crop rotation showed significantly lower leaching than the spring/winter crop rotations, probably due to the spring/winter crop rotation including peas, which may be considered a high-risk crop. Our study highlights that management practices that improve biomass production throughout the year are crucial in order to tighten the nitrogen cycle and thereby reduce nitrate leaching. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Authors:
    • Frederick, J. R.
    • Fortnum, B. A.
    • Bauer, P. J.
  • Source: Agronomy Journal
  • Volume: 102
  • Issue: 4
  • Year: 2010
  • Summary: Longer rain-free periods are predicted to occur more often in the southeastern United States as a result of global climate change. This nonirrigated field study was conducted from 1997 through 2002, which coincided with the 1998-2002 drought that affected most of the United States. The objective was to determine the effect of rotation and tillage on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity. Treatments in the study were rotation [cotton rotated with corn (Zea mays L.), cotton planted after a rye (Secale cereale L.) winter cover crop, and continuous cotton with no cover crop] and tillage system (conventional tillage and conservation tillage). Two levels of aldicarb [2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propanal O-{(methylamino)carbonyl}oxime] (0 and 1.18 kg a.i. ha(-1)) were also included because of known soil management effects on thrips (Frankliniella sp.) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidigyne incognita). The predominant soil types were Bonneau loamy sand (loamy, siliceous, subactive, thermic Arenic Paleudult) and Norfolk loamy sand (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudult). Rotation did not affect cotton yield in any year. Tillage did not affect cotton yield in 1997. Conservation tillage resulted in an average 25% yield increase in cotton lint yield over conventional tillage during the 5-yr drought. Tillage and aldicarb affected both thrips and root-knot nematodes, but lack of interaction among these factors for lint yield suggested that management of these pests was not the predominant cause for the cotton yield increase with conservation tillage. Conservation tillage for cotton production could be an important method to help mitigate the effects of climate change in the region if change occurs as predicted.
  • Authors:
    • Raper, R. L.
    • Siri-Prieto, G.
    • Reeves, D. W.
  • Source: Agronomy Journal
  • Volume: 101
  • Issue: 6
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: The use of crop rotation systems involving winter-annual grazing can help peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) producers increase profitability, although winter-annual grazing could result in excessive soil compaction, which can severely limit yields. We conducted a 3-yr field study on a Dothan loamy sand in southeastern Alabama to develop a conservation tillage system for integrating peanut with winter-annual grazing of stocker cattle under dryland conditions. Winter-annual forages and tillage systems were evaluated in a strip-plot design, where winter forages were oat (Avena sativa L.) and annual ryegrass (Lolium mutiflorum L.). Tillage systems included moldboard and chisel plowing, and combinations of noninversion deep tillage (none, in-row subsoil, or paratill) with/without disking. We evaluated soil water content, peanut leaf stomatal conductance, plant density, peanut yield, peanut net return, and total system annual net return. Peanut following oat increased soil water extraction (15%), stands (12%), and yields (21%) compared with peanut following ryegrass. Strict no-till resulted in the lowest yields (2.29 Mg ha(-1), 42% less than the mean) and noninversion deep tillage (especially in-row subsoil) was required to maximize water use and yields with conservation tillage. Net return from annual grazing ($185 ha(-1), USD) represented 40% of the total return for the best treatment (no-tillage with in-row subsoil following oat = $462 ha(-1)). Integrating winter-annual grazing in this region using noninversion deep tillage following oat in a conservation tillage system can benefit peanut growers, allowing extra income without sacrificing peanut yields.
  • Authors:
    • Wuest, S. B.
    • Siemens, M. C.
    • Gollany, H. T.
    • Williams, J. D.
    • Long, D. S.
  • Source: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Volume: 64
  • Issue: 1
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: Conservation tillage systems that reduce Soil erosion and maintain or increase soil carbon offer long-term benefits for producers in the inland Pacific Northwestern United States but Could result in reduced grain yields due to increased pressure from weeds, disease, and insect pests. Our objective was to compare runoff, soil erosion, and crop yields from a conventional tillage, wheat-fallow two-year rotation and a no-till four-year rotation. The experiment was undertaken within a small,watershed to provide results that would be representative of conservation effectiveness at the field scale. Two neighboring drainages, 5.8 and 10.7 ha (14 and 26 ac), in the 340 mm y(-1) (13.4 in yr(-1)) precipitation zone of northeastern Oregon, were instrumented to record rainfall, runoff, and erosion over a four-year period (2001 through 2004). One drainage was cropped to a winter wheat-fallow rotation and received inversion tillage (tillage fallow). The second drainage was cropped in a four-year no-till rotation: winter wheat-chemical fallow-winter wheat-chickpea (no-till Fallow). We recorded 13 runoff events from the inversion tillage system and 3 from the no-till system. Total runoff and erosion values from inversion tillage drainage were 5.1 mm (0.20 in) and 0.42 Mg ha(-1) (0.19 tn ac(-1)) versus 0.7 mm (0.03 in) and 0.01 Mg ha(-1) (<0.005 in ac(-1)) from no-till drainage. The no-till rotation was substantially more effective in conserving soil and water in this field-scale comparison. Soil erosion observed in this research is a fraction of that reported for similar tillage practices outside of the Pacific Northwestern. Mean wheat yields did not significantly differ between inversion tillage and no-till treatment despite intensifying the rotation by replacing one year of fallow with a chickpea crop in the four-year rotation. Because of high year-to-year variability in yield and limited sample size, more study is needed to compare winter wheat yields in no-till production systems with inversion tillage. The no-till cropping system was more e effective in reducing runoff and soil erosion and provides producers with an ability to protect soil and water resources in the dryland Pacific Northwest.
  • Authors:
    • Comin, J. J.
    • Lovato, P. E.
    • Bittencourt, H. von H.
    • Lana, M. A.
    • Altieri, M. A.
  • Source: ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY
  • Volume: 31
  • Issue: 4
  • Year: 2009
  • Summary: The effect of the winter cover crops rye, oat, ryegrass, vetch and fodder radish (and their mixtures) in no-tillage systems was investigated on soil cover, cover crop biomass and summer weed biomass during the critical competition stage with common bean. Bean yield was also evaluated. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks and four repetitions. The highest soil cover during winter was observed in the treatments rye+vetch, rye+vetch+fodder radish and oat+vetch. The highest values of cover crops biomass production were observed in the treatments rye+vetch+fodder radish. Weed suppression was higher in the ryegrass monoculture and in the rye+vetch+fodder radish association, and there was no correlation between cover crop biomass and summer weed suppression; the best bean yields were achieved with the following treatments: ryegrass in monoculture, oat in monoculture and rye+vetch, producing 1,950, 1,730 e 1,790 kg ha -1 respectively. The monocultures of ryegrass and oat showed the lowest costs with seeds and the highest economic returns.