• Authors:
    • Doran, J. W.
    • Linn, D. M.
  • Source: Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Volume: 48
  • Issue: 4
  • Year: 1984
  • Summary: Surface soils from long-term tillage comparison experiments at six U.S. locations were characterized for aerobic and anaerobic microbial populations and denitrification potential using an in situ acetylene blockage technique. Measurements of soil water content, bulk density, and relative differences in pH, NO-3-N, water-soluble C, and total C and N contents between tillage treatments were also determined at the time of sampling. Numbers of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in surface (0-75 mm) no-till soils averaged 1.35 to 1.41 and 1.27 to 1.31 times greater, respectively, than in surface-plowed soils. Bulk density, volumetric water content, water-filled pore space, and water-soluble C and organic C and N values were similarly greater for surface no-till soils compared to conventionally tilled soils. Deeper in the soil (75-300 mm), however, aerobic microbial populations were significantly greater in conventionally tilled soils. In contrast, below 150 mm, the numbers of anaerobic microorganisms differed little between tillage treatments. In no-till soils, however, these organisms were found to comprise a greater proportion of the total bacterial population than in conventionally tilled soils. Measurements of the denitrification potential from soils at three locations generally followed the observed differences in anaerobic microbial populations. Denitrifying activity, after irrigation with 15 mm of water, was substantially greater in surface 0- to 75-mm no-till soils than in conventionally tilled soils at all locations. At the 75- to 150-mm soil depth, however, the denitrification potential in conventionally tilled soils was the same or higher than that of no-till soils. In surface no-till soils, increased numbers of anaerobic microorganisms and a substantially greater denitrification potential, following irrigation, indicate the presence of less-aerobic conditions in comparison to conventionally tilled soils. This condition appears to result from greater soil bulk densities and/or water contents of no-till soils, which act to increase water-filled porosity and the potential for water to act as a barrier to the diffusion of oxygen through the soil profile.
  • Authors:
    • Fenster, C. R.
    • Mannering, J. V.
  • Source: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Volume: 38
  • Issue: 3
  • Year: 1983
  • Authors:
    • Partoharjono, S.
    • Hairiah, K.
    • Van Noordwijk, M.
    • Labios, R. V.
    • Garrity, D. P.
  • Source: Agroforestry Systems
  • Volume: 36
  • Issue: 1-3
  • Summary: Purely annual crop-based production systems have limited scope to be sustainable under upland conditions prone to infestation by Imperata cylindrica if animal or mechanical tillage is not available. Farmers who must rely on manual cultivation of grassland soils can achieve some success in suppressing Imperata for a number of years using intensive relay and intercropping systems that maintain a dense soil cover throughout the year, especially where leguminous cover crops are included in the crop cycle. However, tabour investment increases and returns to tabour tend to decrease in successive years as weed pressure intensifies and soil quality declines. Continuous crop production has been sustained in many Imperata-infested areas where farmers have access to animal or tractor draft power. Imperata control is not a major problem in such situations. Draft power drastically reduces the tabour requirements in weed control. Sustained crop production is then dependent more solely upon soil fertility management. Mixed farming systems that include cattle may also benefit from manure application to the cropped area, and the use of non-cropped fallow areas for grazing. In extensive systems where Imperata infestation is tolerated, cassava or sugarcane are often the crops with the longest period of viable production as the land degrades. On sloping Imperata lands, conservation farming practices are necessary to sustain annual cropping. Pruned tree hedgerows have often been recommended for these situations. On soils that are not strongly acidic they may consistently improve yields. But tabour is the scarcest resource on small farms and tree-pruning is usually too tabour-intensive to be practical. Buffer strip systems that provide excellent soil conservation but minimize tabour have proven much more popular with farmers. Prominent among these are natural vegetative strips, or strips of introduced fodder grasses. The value of Imperata to restore soil fertility is low, particularly compared with woody secondary growth or Compositae species such as Chromolaena odorata or Tithonia diversifolia. Therefore, fallow-rotation systems where farmers can intervene to shift the fallow vegetation toward such naturally-occurring species, or can manage introduced cover crop species such as Mucuna utilis cv. cochinchinensis, enable substantial gains in yields and sustainability. Tree fallows are used successfully to achieve sustained cropping by some upland communities. A variation of this is rotational hedgerow intercropping, where a period of cropping is followed by one or more years of tree growth to generate nutrient-rich biomass, rehabilitate the soil, and suppress Imperata. These options, which suit farmers in quite resource-poor situations, should receive more attention.